grub-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] osdep/linux: Fix md array device enumeration


From: Daniel Kiper
Subject: Re: [PATCH] osdep/linux: Fix md array device enumeration
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2023 15:39:24 +0200
User-agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)

On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 11:02:31AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 10:27 AM Julian Andres Klode
> <julian.klode@canonical.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 07:09:26PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 06:15:27PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 06:10:21PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > This patch is in upstream as commit c39f27cd6 (osdep/linux: Fix md array
> > > device enumeration).
>
> Oh good. I really thought it had landed already, so thanks for
> checking. I got worried this morning when I saw the email to
> grub-devel. :P "Wasn't that fixed already?" :) But thank you for
> making sure it hadn't gotten lost! Is there a way to close the tracker
> item for it?

I think you should be able to do that. If not I can try to do that for you.

> > [...]
> > > I realized right now that MD_MAX_DISKS defined in commit c39f27cd6
> > > (osdep/linux: Fix md array device enumeration) is not in sync with
> > > commit 2a5e3c1f2 (disk/diskfilter: Don't make a RAID array with more
> > > than 1024 disks). I think we should sync both numbers down to 1024...
> >
> > +1
>
> Yeah, seems reasonable, though as I hinted in the original patch, this
> number appeared to have been arbitrarily chosen by mdadm at the time.

OK, we will bump it to 4096 as well.

Daniel



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]