grub-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 1/2] fs/erofs: Add support for EROFS


From: Gao Xiang
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] fs/erofs: Add support for EROFS
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2023 10:04:53 +0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0

Hi,

On 2023/9/8 03:57, Daniel Kiper wrote:
Hi Gao,

On Wed, Sep 06, 2023 at 01:46:25PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
Hi Daniel,

On 2023/7/21 01:37, Glenn Washburn wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jul 2023 21:14:22 +0800
<zhaoyifan@sjtu.edu.cn> wrote:

Thank you for the reply!

As Xiang pointed out, we believe that uncompressed support for
EROFS is still valuable, so I would be very grateful if this
support could be merged into the GRUB mainline.

Yes, I believe this will get merged into master. The question is
"when", after or before release. Now that I know that the compression is
on a per-file basis and so this version can still be widely used (with
the condition that the kernel and initrd are uncompressed by EROFS), I
am in support of having this included in the upcoming release.
Ultimately the decision is Daniel's though.

ping.. May I ask what's your opinion of EROFS uncompressed support
for GRUB.  I assume compressed EROFS support needs more work to do,
so could we support uncompressed support as the first step since
EROFS supports per-file compression configuration?

The v4 version is already finished with Glenn's RVB:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2023-07/msg00102.html

We are in the GRUB 2.12 release process and busy with it. I will take
a look at the patch set after the release. Sorry for delay.

Okay, thanks.


By the way, we expect to bring support for the EROFS compression
part within a few weeks. However, AFAIK, GRUB lacks generic
support for lz4 compression algorithms. Would it be more
appropriate to introduce a dedicated lz4 library for EROFS, like
zfs, or generic lz4 support for grub?

I have not looked into ZFS's usage of its internal library, nor how
hard it would be to make it a separate module. But I prefer the
separate module approach. Perhaps Daniel can speak to his preferred> method.

I agree with Glenn, please put/move lz4 compression code to separate module.

Thanks for the confirmation on this stuff!

Thanks,
Gao Xiang


Daniel



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]