Re: low level macros & reflection

[Marius Vollmer]

<address@hidden> writes:

> are there any examples that i can look up, or can anyone describe
> for me how i should go about accessing this data from inside of
> scheme?

One goal of Guile is to support multiple syntaxen, but we are not
really there yet.  The idea is to replace the Scheme function `read'
with one that reads a different syntax and translates it into Scheme.

Generally, I wouldn't recommend to use the low-level macro system
because we might not want to support it in the future.  Things ought
to be easier anyway when you stick to `define-macro'.