[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: namespaces, goops, etc.
From: |
Lars J. Aas |
Subject: |
Re: namespaces, goops, etc. |
Date: |
Fri, 3 Nov 2000 18:33:23 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 05:16:17PM +0000, Jost Boekemeier wrote:
: While the current implementation of define-public may be problematic,
: define-public itself isn't a misfeature at all. The only problem I
: see is that the name is too long. What about `define*' instead?
`define*' is in use in (ice-9 optargs), I just learned.
Lars J
- Re: namespaces, goops, etc., (continued)
- Re: namespaces, goops, etc., Michael Livshin, 2000/11/03
- Re: namespaces, goops, etc., Lars J. Aas, 2000/11/03
- Re: namespaces, goops, etc., Lars J. Aas, 2000/11/03
- Re: namespaces, goops, etc., Mikael Djurfeldt, 2000/11/06
- Re: namespaces, goops, etc., Michael Livshin, 2000/11/07
- Re: namespaces, goops, etc., Mikael Djurfeldt, 2000/11/08
- Re: namespaces, goops, etc., Mikael Djurfeldt, 2000/11/06
Re: namespaces, goops, etc., Mikael Djurfeldt, 2000/11/06
Re: namespaces, goops, etc., Mikael Djurfeldt, 2000/11/06
Re: namespaces, goops, etc., Jost Boekemeier, 2000/11/03
- Re: namespaces, goops, etc.,
Lars J. Aas <=
- Re: namespaces, goops, etc., thi, 2000/11/03
- Re: namespaces, goops, etc., Jost Boekemeier, 2000/11/03
- Re: namespaces, goops, etc., Michael Livshin, 2000/11/03
- Re: namespaces, goops, etc., thi, 2000/11/03
- Re: namespaces, goops, etc., Lars J. Aas, 2000/11/03
- Re: namespaces, goops, etc., thi, 2000/11/03
- Re: namespaces, goops, etc., thi, 2000/11/03
- Re: namespaces, goops, etc., Michael Livshin, 2000/11/03
- Re: namespaces, goops, etc., Mikael Djurfeldt, 2000/11/06
- Re: namespaces, goops, etc., Mikael Djurfeldt, 2000/11/06