Re: guile for lisp set

[Marius Vollmer]

Mikael Djurfeldt <address@hidden> writes:

> Marius Vollmer <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > So, I myself will avoid using local-eval as long as I can and not
> > promise that it will always be around.  Others might disagree.
> 
> I agree that local-eval shouldn't be part of the standard Guile API.
> 
> However, it should stay as a binding for now since it's used in the
> debugger when evaluating expressions in local frames.
> 
> Maybe we could bunch together that kind of bindings in a special
> "reflection" module which is implementation-specific and not
> guaranteed to stay constant?

Yes, that's a good idea.