[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is my procedure getting GCed?
From: |
Brett Viren |
Subject: |
Re: Is my procedure getting GCed? |
Date: |
Tue, 1 May 2001 13:16:35 -0400 (EDT) |
Michael Livshin writes:
>
> the Guile GC only knows about the calling stack and the registers.
>
> if all the instances of ScalarBC are automatic (i.e. sit on the
> stack), then there should be no problem. but if you `new' them or
> they are static, then you definitely should inform Guile about the
> fProc field.
>
> try adding this to the constructor:
>
> scm_protect_object (fProc); // once fProc is intialized, of course
This is exactly what was going on. Thanks a bunch!
> hth, never mind the Totally Random signature,
...
> ... it's just that in C++ and the like, you don't trust _anybody_,
> and in CLOS you basically trust everybody. the practical result
> is that thieves and bums use C++ and nice people use CLOS.
> -- Erik Naggum
This must be a forgery. I have read Erik's posts on comp.lang.lisp
and I don't think I have ever heard him be this polite....
Since I am mixing the two, I guess it makes me a ``nice bum''.
Cheers,
-Brett.
- Is my procedure getting GCed?, Brett Viren, 2001/05/01
- Re: Is my procedure getting GCed?, Michael Livshin, 2001/05/01
- Re: Is my procedure getting GCed?,
Brett Viren <=
- Re: Is my procedure getting GCed?, Bill Gribble, 2001/05/01
- Re: Is my procedure getting GCed?, Michael Livshin, 2001/05/01
- Re: Is my procedure getting GCed?, Dirk Herrmann, 2001/05/07
- Re: Is my procedure getting GCed?, Michael Livshin, 2001/05/07
- Re: Is my procedure getting GCed?, Marius Vollmer, 2001/05/14
- Re: Is my procedure getting GCed?, Dirk Herrmann, 2001/05/14
- Re: Is my procedure getting GCed?, Dirk Herrmann, 2001/05/15
- Re: Is my procedure getting GCed?, Brett Viren, 2001/05/01
- Re: Is my procedure getting GCed?, Marius Vollmer, 2001/05/01
- Re: Is my procedure getting GCed?, Dale P. Smith, 2001/05/01