Re: To gh_ or not to gh_?

[Thomas Bushnell, BSG]

Rob Browning <address@hidden> writes:

> Note that I believe the current primary tactic is for the other
> languages to be translated via a front-end into a low-level scheme
> representation that will then be executed by the interpreter, a VM, a
> JIT compiler, or perhaps .so code generated via C->gcc->so
> conversion.  All of these options are being discussed on guile-devel
> right now, and we may end up with a hybrid in the end.

I think that's a poor version.  We should translate the other
languages into Scheme.  The ease of doing this is precisely why Scheme
was chosen.