[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: leaf environments vs eval environments?
From: |
Michael Livshin |
Subject: |
Re: leaf environments vs eval environments? |
Date: |
22 Jun 2001 18:39:33 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Copyleft) |
Michael Livshin <address@hidden> writes:
> so your evaluation would proceed like this:
>
> scm_c_with_fluid (this_fluid, AS_SMOB (this), call_string_evaluating_method,
> this);
>
> and `call_string_evaluating_method' is defined thusly:
>
> extern "C" void
> call_string_evaluating_method (StringEvaluatingClass *obj)
> {
> obj->do_string_evaluation ();
> }
nah. no need for middlemen:
scm_c_with_fluid (this_fluid, AS_SMOB (this), scm_eval_0str, "...");
--
Hit the philistines three times over the head with the Elisp reference manual.
-- Michael A. Petonic
- leaf environments vs eval environments?, Lars J. Aas, 2001/06/22
- Re: leaf environments vs eval environments?, Lars J. Aas, 2001/06/22
- Re: leaf environments vs eval environments?, Neil Jerram, 2001/06/22
- Re: leaf environments vs eval environments?, Lars J. Aas, 2001/06/22
- Re: leaf environments vs eval environments?, Lars J. Aas, 2001/06/22
- Re: leaf environments vs eval environments?, Neil Jerram, 2001/06/22
- Re: leaf environments vs eval environments?, Michael Livshin, 2001/06/22
- Re: leaf environments vs eval environments?, Lars J. Aas, 2001/06/22
- Re: leaf environments vs eval environments?,
Michael Livshin <=
- Re: leaf environments vs eval environments?, Marius Vollmer, 2001/06/22
- Re: leaf environments vs eval environments?, Lars J. Aas, 2001/06/25