|
From: | Sam Tregar |
Subject: | Re: No gh_set_x()? |
Date: | Tue, 10 Jul 2001 19:28:14 -0400 (EDT) |
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Brett Viren wrote: > I asked this a while back. You can use gh_define(). I had assumed gh_define() established top-level bindings like (define). How is this a replacement for a gh_set_x()? -sam
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |