Guile At Work (was Re: Gurus? Care to re-explain the absense of gh_set

guile-user

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Guile At Work (was Re: Gurus? Care to re-explain the absense of gh_set_

From:	Evan Prodromou
Subject:	Guile At Work (was Re: Gurus? Care to re-explain the absense of gh_set_x() for me?)
Date:	14 Jul 2001 11:43:52 -0700
User-agent:	Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.0.103

>>>>> "TN" == Thien-Thi Nguyen <address@hidden> writes:

    TN> obGuile: this place of work was using guile-1.2 for a long
    TN> time (before logical ops worked w/ bignums), and only recently
    TN> switched to guile-1.4.  they had coded up arbitrary-length
    TN> variants for logand, logior, and logxor, w/o contributing them
    TN> back to guile.  :-(

Wow! You get paid for writing Guile?

Rockin'! There's still hope for the world, I guess.

~ESP
(Still locked in Javur hell)

-- 
Evan Prodromou
address@hidden

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

Re: Gurus? Care to re-explain the absense of gh_set_x() for me?, (continued)
- Re: No gh_set_x()?, Dirk Esser, 2001/07/13
- Re: No gh_set_x()?, Steven G. Johnson, 2001/07/16
  - Re: No gh_set_x()?, Marius Vollmer, 2001/07/22

Prev by Date: Re: Gurus? Care to re-explain the absense of gh_set_x() for me?
Next by Date: Re: Guile At Work (was Re: Gurus? Care to re-explain the absense of gh_set_x() for me?)
Previous by thread: Re: Gurus? Care to re-explain the absense of gh_set_x() for me?
Next by thread: Re: Guile At Work (was Re: Gurus? Care to re-explain the absense of gh_set_x() for me?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread