[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lost: guile 1.7.0 doesn't look to GUILE_LOAD_PATH ?
From: |
Thomas Wawrzinek |
Subject: |
Re: lost: guile 1.7.0 doesn't look to GUILE_LOAD_PATH ? |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Aug 2001 15:24:55 +0200 (MEST) |
Hi!
address@hidden wrote:
> however, when it comes to libpostgres, it only looks to 2 places ?!?
That's not true. I piped your output thru grep, and there are at least two
versions of libpostgres installed on your system, namely:
open("/usr/local/lib/libpostgres.so", O_RDONLY) = 6
and
open("/usr/lib/libpostgres.so.2", O_RDONLY) = 6
are in your file.
I must admit, that the output is a bit of a mystery to me, too. It seems
there are inter-dependencies between postgres and pgsql, are there?
However, the (dynamic-link ...) call in postgres.scm tries to pull in a
libtool library (grepped output):
open("/usr/local/share/guile/database/postgres.scm", O_RDONLY) = 5
read(5, ";; $Id: postgres.scm.in,v 1.3 20"..., 4096) = 1594
open("/lib/libpostgres.la", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
open("/usr/lib/libpostgres.la", O_RDONLY) = 6
read(6, "# libpostgres.la - a libtool lib"..., 4096) = 718
/usr/lib/libpostgres.la is a human readable file so you can check it out.
I believe it points to /usr/lib/libpostgres.so.2 (not sure though).
Maybe the fact that there are versions of postgres.so installed in both
/usr/lib and /usr/local/lib confuses guile.
I'd try to get rid of the installation that the /lib/libpostgres.la doesn't
point to.
If this doesn't help I believe you need to find out whether there are
depedencies as mentioned, and what (strange) things they cause. Not sure,
though.
Regards,
Thomas
- lost: guile 1.7.0 doesn't look to GUILE_LOAD_PATH ?, David Pirotte, 2001/08/27
- Re: lost: guile 1.7.0 doesn't look to GUILE_LOAD_PATH ?, Thomas Wawrzinek, 2001/08/28
- Re: lost: guile 1.7.0 doesn't look to GUILE_LOAD_PATH ?, David Pirotte, 2001/08/28
- Re: lost: guile 1.7.0 doesn't look to GUILE_LOAD_PATH ?, Thomas Wawrzinek, 2001/08/28
- Re: lost: guile 1.7.0 doesn't look to GUILE_LOAD_PATH ?, David Pirotte, 2001/08/28
- Re: lost: guile 1.7.0 doesn't look to GUILE_LOAD_PATH ?, Thomas Wawrzinek, 2001/08/28
- Re: lost: guile 1.7.0 doesn't look to GUILE_LOAD_PATH ?, David Pirotte, 2001/08/28
- Re: lost: guile 1.7.0 doesn't look to GUILE_LOAD_PATH ?,
Thomas Wawrzinek <=
- Re: lost: guile 1.7.0 doesn't look to GUILE_LOAD_PATH ?, David Pirotte, 2001/08/28
- Re: lost: guile 1.7.0 doesn't look to GUILE_LOAD_PATH ?, Thomas Wawrzinek, 2001/08/29
- Re: lost: guile 1.7.0 doesn't look to GUILE_LOAD_PATH ?, David Pirotte, 2001/08/29
- Re: lost: guile 1.7.0 doesn't look to GUILE_LOAD_PATH ?, Thomas Wawrzinek, 2001/08/29
- Re: lost: guile 1.7.0 doesn't look to GUILE_LOAD_PATH ?, Marius Vollmer, 2001/08/29
- Re: lost: guile 1.7.0 doesn't look to GUILE_LOAD_PATH ?, Marius Vollmer, 2001/08/29