[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions
From: |
Rob Browning |
Subject: |
Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Apr 2003 12:03:22 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.3 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) |
MJ Ray <address@hidden> writes:
> At least bigloo and plt-scheme use pregexp. It would be very useful
> if guile could offer a partially compatible interface, regardless of
> the underlying implementation.
Well that sounds like a pretty good argument in favor of pregexp --
I'll look in to it. Of course we can only include it in guile-core
(without a rewrite) if the author's amenable to the LGPL and copyright
assignment. If pregexp *is* suitable, I can probably handle improving
the performance. I'll ask the author.
> Good aim, but I'd like the more general: a powerful regex lib whose
> syntax and behaviour is invariant across all the platforms on which I
> run scheme.
>
> Is that achievable?
Should be. Ideally, that might be encouraged via a suitable SRFI.
Wonder if pregexp might be appropriate...
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org
Previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, (continued)
Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, Rob Browning, 2003/04/28
Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, tomas, 2003/04/28
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, Rob Browning, 2003/04/28
- Re: Stupid module and pregexp questions, MJ Ray, 2003/04/28
- Low level things in C or Scheme [was Stupid module and pregexp questions], tomas, 2003/04/29
- Re: Low level things in C or Scheme [was Stupid module and pregexp questions], Thamer Al-Harbash, 2003/04/29
- Re: Low level things in C or Scheme, Mikael Djurfeldt, 2003/04/29