Re: smobs

[Dr. Peter Ivanyi]

address@hidden wrote:

> Ah, I think I get it. Since tt is `just an int', its *content*
> gets copied into the smob, not a ref to tt. Thus, no problem if
> `tt disappears' as the stack is popped. Does this help, Peter?

Yes, that was it. I have also reread the documentation and it
does indicate it. I was, for some reason, imagening the system
more complicated than it is.

Thanks for everybody's help.

                                        Peter Ivanyi