Re: Functions in libguile vs SRFIs

[Nic]

Stephen Compall <address@hidden> writes:

> On the functions now duplicated (some with slight enhancements) 
> between libguile and the SRFIs: 
>  
> Are the ones in libguile (going to be) deprecated?  If not, are the 
> SRFI versions preferred?  If not, IMHO, they should be, for the sake 
> of modularity (not to mention standards). 

On this note: is the guile team interested in getting documentation
patches which merge the doc of srfi's into the body of the doc? 

For example: the section on Compound-Types/Lists includes all the
srfi-1 functions.

I'd be happy to do the occasional documentation patch on this basis.


Nic Ferrier