guile-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Newbie - desigining apps


From: Neil Jerram
Subject: Re: Newbie - desigining apps
Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2004 22:47:45 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.4.4-4GB i686; en-US; 0.8.1) Gecko/20010515

Max Polk wrote:

I'm intending on moving forward with free software development and understand Guile is the official extensibility language of GNU, and that I ought to support it in my application. Makes sense, fine.
Now for this to be useful at all, my application has to be designed from 
the beginning to accommodate external control.  That's a big thing, 
writing an app that controls itself by traditional design, versus 
writing an app that is controlled from the outside.
Have others found that supporting Guile in an application means 
rethinking how it runs at it's very core?  For example, instead of 
writing use cases and designing from that, now I have a use case like 
"let the user call any higher-level function".
Even worse, what about object orientation?  Is it possible to let the 
user create, then assemble together, use, then destroy various program 
objects, all from Guile?  And how is even that done, returning C++ 
objects back to Guile -- I assume you would have to return a handle 
representing the internal program object, then add some management layer 
that maps these handles to internal objects.
WOW!  This is a radically new approach to software development!

Can someone can start me off on the right foot?
I'll have a go ...  I'd say the main thing is to be clear on why you 
want to add Guile to your application.  There is one good reason, for 
example, that may have nothing to do with extensibility, namely that you 
yourself simply prefer programming in Scheme to programming in C.  In 
this case (and assuming that there is something that ties you to C, such 
as needing to interface to existing code), the trick is to create a 
C<->Scheme interface as close as possible to your existing code, and 
then use the Scheme side of this interface to write the rest of the 
application in Scheme.  In this case the high level control design in 
Scheme may be essentially the same as it would be if you had written in 
C.  (Modulo functional/imperative style differences and continuations, 
which can turn an event-driven program inside out if you choose to use 
them.)
On the other hand, if it _is_ extensibility that you are after, by 
definition that means that you expect other people to code things that 
are not in the core application, but you presumably have some idea of 
the kind of extensions that you want to enable them to write?
I could say more by offering some examples, but it probably makes most 
sense for you to say a bit more about your application first, so that 
the discussion can be more targeted.
Regards,
    Neil





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]