Re: Using a macro with FOLD alters FOLD procedure!

[Rob Browning]

Neil Jerram <address@hidden> writes:

> FWIW, I agree.  In 1.7.x I believe we have more of the infrastructure
> in place to get this right - by which I mean to signal an error if a
> macro is passed in this way.  But (having just tried your tests out on
> 1.7.x) it's not doing this just yet.

I haven't considered it carefully yet, but if fold's only supposed to
take a procedure for kons, then why not just add a check-arg-type
procedure? call for kons?

-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592  F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4