[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Modified load-path proposal
From: |
Neil Jerram |
Subject: |
Re: Modified load-path proposal |
Date: |
Mon, 31 Oct 2005 19:22:31 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Thien-Thi Nguyen <address@hidden> writes:
> From: Neil Jerram <address@hidden>
> Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 22:59:32 +0000
>
> Not sure what you mean by "to get around it". Do you mean that
> someone will change the design so that the interface does the
> enforcement itself; or that if the interface is precise about what it
> allows, someone will want to change it to be more permissive in future?
>
> both interpretations are fine.
Yes, but which one did you mean? It seems to me that they have
opposite implications.
> perlis?
>
> google?
Fair point.
Neil
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, (continued)
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Kevin Ryde, 2005/10/22
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Neil Jerram, 2005/10/28
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Neil Jerram, 2005/10/30
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2005/10/30
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Neil Jerram, 2005/10/30
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2005/10/31
- Re: Modified load-path proposal,
Neil Jerram <=
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Tomas Zerolo, 2005/10/31
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Kevin Ryde, 2005/10/30
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Tomas Zerolo, 2005/10/31
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Neil Jerram, 2005/10/31
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Kevin Ryde, 2005/10/31
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Neil Jerram, 2005/10/15
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Greg Troxel, 2005/10/15
- Re: Modified load-path proposal, Neil Jerram, 2005/10/15
Re: Modified load-path proposal, Ludovic Courtès, 2005/10/14