[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SOS: Simple Object System
From: |
David Séverin |
Subject: |
Re: SOS: Simple Object System |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Sep 2008 19:14:22 -0300 |
Le Wed, 24 Sep 2008 23:04:51 +0200,
"Maciek Godek" <address@hidden> a écrit :
> Note however that both these languages were invented to address
> the particular needs of OOP and as such are well suited for that purpose
> (or at least that's what the most people think. CLOS is rarely used
> compared to C++ and Java -- can you explain why?)
because most people are ... and 'nobody will ever be killed to propose the
use of C++ and java ...' people like to conform to others, like your question
shows, are you under some kind of industrial pressure ? : who says,
in a scientific community, that a system is 'good' because 'most people uses
it' ?
I personally think that, from a grammar and semantic point of view, CLOS and
GOOP are superior, by far, to other OOP systems, as the few responses on this
list pointed out [but there are a lot more to say and articles to read about
this matter]
IMHO
david
- SOS: Simple Object System, Maciek Godek, 2008/09/13
- Re: SOS: Simple Object System, Neil Jerram, 2008/09/14
- Re: SOS: Simple Object System, Greg Troxel, 2008/09/14
- Re: SOS: Simple Object System, Andy Wingo, 2008/09/15
- Re: SOS: Simple Object System, Maciek Godek, 2008/09/24
- Re: SOS: Simple Object System, Ludovic Courtès, 2008/09/24
- Re: SOS: Simple Object System, Clinton Ebadi, 2008/09/24
- Re: SOS: Simple Object System, Maciek Godek, 2008/09/24
- Re: SOS: Simple Object System,
David Séverin <=
- Re: SOS: Simple Object System, Clinton Ebadi, 2008/09/24
- Re: SOS: Simple Object System, Linas Vepstas, 2008/09/25
- Re: SOS: Simple Object System, Maciek Godek, 2008/09/26
- Re: SOS: Simple Object System, David Séverin, 2008/09/25
- Re: SOS: Simple Object System, Maciek Godek, 2008/09/25
- Re: SOS: Simple Object System, Jon Wilson, 2008/09/24
- Re: SOS: Simple Object System, Jon Wilson, 2008/09/24