Re: srfi-34 and raise

[Andy Wingo]

Greets,

On Sun 06 Jun 2010 22:47, address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:

> Andy Wingo <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> As it is I'm changing srfi-34 in git to use #:replace instead of
>> #:export, so as to be more DWIM-y. It's always an option for a user in
>> their module to do #:duplicates (check), after all...
>
> FWIW, I agree but not everybody does:
>
>   http://www.mail-archive.com/address@hidden/msg00469.html

Ah, that is a nice discussion, thank you for the link. I see both sides
but I am tired of the warning, so I think we should acquiesce here,
knowing that #:duplicates (check) is always an option.

> There are also many bindings that could be #:replaced in the rnrs
> modules.

Yes, we should fix that. Perhaps Julian would be willing to do that? :-)

Cheers,

Andy
-- 
http://wingolog.org/