Re: srfi-34 and raise

[Andy Wingo]

On Mon 07 Jun 2010 12:07, address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:

> Julian Graham <address@hidden> writes:
>
>>>> There are also many bindings that could be #:replaced in the rnrs
>>>> modules.
>>>
>>> Yes, we should fix that. Perhaps Julian would be willing to do that? :-)
>>
>> Sure, although the solution that springs to my mind first is to make
>> all bindings introduced by R6RS libraries #:replace-ing, via the
>> `import' transformer.  Objections?
>
> Can you give an example of what you mean?

Yes I think I would want an example as well. I guess I would prefer that
only exports to bindings in (guile) would be #:replaced (but that
decision made programatically).

A
-- 
http://wingolog.org/