[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: List functions
From: |
Joel James Adamson |
Subject: |
Re: List functions |
Date: |
Wed, 01 Dec 2010 12:35:53 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Hans Aberg <address@hidden> writes:
> It seems natural to translate (f, g) x into ((f g) x), and () x into
> (() x), but I'm not sure if the lists (f g) and () can be made acting
> as functions this way.
(f g) would evaluate as a composition as long as f takes a procedure as
an argument and returns a function that takes x as its argument. No
problems there. Alternatively you could think of f returning a function
of x when it evaluates g.
Joel
--
Joel J. Adamson
Servedio Lab
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
FSF Member #8164
http://www.unc.edu/~adamsonj
pgpJsX2j0O7wl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- List functions, Hans Aberg, 2010/12/01
- Re: List functions,
Joel James Adamson <=
- Re: List functions, Hans Aberg, 2010/12/01
- Re: List functions, Keith Wright, 2010/12/01
- Re: List functions, Hans Aberg, 2010/12/01
- Re: List functions, Hans Aberg, 2010/12/01
- Re: List functions, Keith Wright, 2010/12/01
- Re: List functions, Hans Aberg, 2010/12/01
- Re: List functions, Hans Aberg, 2010/12/01
- Re: List functions, Hans Aberg, 2010/12/03
Re: List functions, Andy Wingo, 2010/12/01