[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: manipulating continuations
|
From: |
Andy Wingo |
|
Subject: |
Re: manipulating continuations |
|
Date: |
Sat, 12 Feb 2011 22:33:06 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) |
On Sat 12 Feb 2011 21:56, Thien-Thi Nguyen <address@hidden> writes:
> () Andy Wingo <address@hidden>
> () Sat, 12 Feb 2011 18:16:20 +0100
>
> R5RS and R6RS's continuations are not generally useful for making
> abstractions that compose well together. I would not recommend them to
> anyone.
>
> Are you saying Guile 2.0 breaks code that uses these traditional
> continuations (successfully, in previous Guile versions)?
No, I am not saying that. Tom's code works the same on Guile 1.8 and on
1.9/2.0.
Regards,
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/