[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: guile 2.0.9 build on mingw
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: guile 2.0.9 build on mingw |
Date: |
Sun, 16 Jun 2013 23:22:57 +0300 |
> From: address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès)
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 21:50:40 +0200
>
> > Please find the changes to do this below. I removed most of the
> > HAVE_POSIX ifdef's, as they are no longer needed.
>
> Sorry I had overlooked this one. It looks nice!
Thanks.
> We would need the copyright to be assigned to the FSF before it can be
> committed. How does that sound? If you’re willing to do so, I can send
> you the paperwork off-line.
Please do.
> > --- libguile/filesys.c~0 2013-04-09 09:52:31.000000000 +0300
> > +++ libguile/filesys.c 2013-06-12 13:41:31.244477700 +0300
> > @@ -112,7 +112,12 @@
> >
> > /* Some more definitions for the native Windows port. */
> > #ifdef __MINGW32__
> > -# define fsync(fd) _commit (fd)
> > +# define fsync(fd) _commit (fd)
> > +# define WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN
>
> What does that mean? :-)
It prevents the compiler from fetching too much from the windows.h
header, thus minimizing the possibility of conflicts with other
headers and macros.
> > +# include <windows.h>
> > +/* FIXME: Should use 'link' module from gnulib. */
> > +# define link(f1,f2) CreateHardLink(f2, f1, NULL)
> > +# define HAVE_LINK 1
>
> Let’s do it then, and remove that part of the patch.
Right.
> > -#ifdef HAVE_POSIX
> > -
>
> Note that HAVE_POSIX really means --enable-posix. Since this patch
> keeps that option, it should probably keep the #ifdefs. That would be a
> topic for a separate patch.
What is the purpose of --enable-posix? I thought it could be removed,
once you accepted the changes to the sources.
> > +#ifdef HAVE_FORK
> > pid = fork ();
> > +#elif defined(__MINGW32__)
> > + {
> > + int save_stdin = -1, save_stdout = -1;
> > + int errno_save;
> > +
> > + if (reading)
>
> [...]
>
> Could this MinGW-specific code be moved to a separate function?
Yes. But there are still non-FORK parts of the patch elsewhere in
this function that are needed.
> I think the patch also needs something like this:
>
> --- a/configure.ac
> +++ b/configure.ac
> @@ -760,7 +760,7 @@ AC_CHECK_FUNCS([DINFINITY DQNAN cexp chsize clog clog10
> ctermid \
> sched_setaffinity sendfile])
>
> AM_CONDITIONAL([BUILD_ICE_9_POPEN],
> - [test "x$enable_posix" = "xyes" && test "x$ac_cv_func_fork" = "xyes"])
> + [test "x$enable_posix" = "xyes"])
Right you are.
- Re: guile 2.0.9 build on mingw, (continued)
- Re: guile 2.0.9 build on mingw, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/06/16
- Re: guile 2.0.9 build on mingw, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/06/16
- Re: guile 2.0.9 build on mingw, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/06/12
- Re: guile 2.0.9 build on mingw, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/06/16
- Re: guile 2.0.9 build on mingw, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/06/12
- Re: guile 2.0.9 build on mingw, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/06/16
- Re: guile 2.0.9 build on mingw,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: guile 2.0.9 build on mingw, Mark H Weaver, 2013/06/17
- Re: guile 2.0.9 build on mingw, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/06/18
- Re: guile 2.0.9 build on mingw, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/06/18
- Re: guile 2.0.9 build on mingw, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/06/18
- Re: guile 2.0.9 build on mingw, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/06/18
- Re: guile 2.0.9 build on mingw, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/06/19
- Re: guile 2.0.9 build on mingw, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/06/19