[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Determining programatically whether the interpreter is Guile or Clis
From: |
Nala Ginrut |
Subject: |
Re: Determining programatically whether the interpreter is Guile or Clisp or Emcs |
Date: |
Wed, 31 Jul 2013 14:48:35 +0800 |
On Wed, 2013-07-31 at 10:28 +0400, 白い熊 wrote:
> Nala Ginrut <address@hidden> wrote:
> >you may try:
> >(with-output-to-string (lambda () (apropos "guile")))
> >you're so lucky that "with-output-to-string" appears in clisp, but I'm
> >not familiar with elisp
>
> Very close I think, it exists in elisp too, however
> (with-output-to-string (lambda () (apropos "clisp")))
> is true in guile and there is no way to test equality with "" using =
>
> So how do I determine the string is empty with lisp equivalent code? Can't
> use equal? because it doesn't exist in lisp...
Guile has "string=", clisp has it too, I don't familiar with elisp (if
you use elisp in Guile, you could call Guile's own procs too)
> --
> 白い熊
>
- Determining programatically whether the interpreter is Guile or Clisp or Emcs, 白い熊, 2013/07/29
- Re: Determining programatically whether the interpreter is Guile or Clisp or Emcs, Nala Ginrut, 2013/07/29
- Re: Determining programatically whether the interpreter is Guile or Clisp or Emcs, 白い熊, 2013/07/29
- Re: Determining programatically whether the interpreter is Guile or Clisp or Emcs, Nala Ginrut, 2013/07/30
- Re: Determining programatically whether the interpreter is Guile or Clisp or Emcs, 白い熊, 2013/07/31
- Re: Determining programatically whether the interpreter is Guile or Clisp or Emcs, Nala Ginrut, 2013/07/31
- Re: Determining programatically whether the interpreter is Guile or Clisp or Emcs, Nala Ginrut, 2013/07/31
- Re: Determining programatically whether the interpreter is Guile or Clisp or Emcs, 白い熊, 2013/07/31
- Re: Determining programatically whether the interpreter is Guile or Clisp or Emcs,
Nala Ginrut <=
Re: Determining programatically whether the interpreter is Guile or Clisp or Emcs, Alexei Matveev, 2013/07/31