Re: Determining programatically whether the interpreter is Guile or Clisp or Emcs

[Nala Ginrut]

On Wed, 2013-07-31 at 12:20 +0200, Ralf Mattes wrote:
> Isn't the main problem here that the OP assumes that all three languages
> have "the same syntax"? This isn't true at all. They share some basic
> syntax but any "real" CL/Elisp/Scheme code will use more than this basic
> subset. And even within this limited syntactic subset, while one syntax 
> will work the same syntactic consgruct will have different _semantics_.
> 
>  Cheers, Ralf Mattes
> 

Yes, I'm afraid you're right, so I said pre-process is more portable.
Anyway, the project based on such an assumption will be very fragile.