[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Transient environment with standard functions
From: |
Basa Centro |
Subject: |
Re: Transient environment with standard functions |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Jun 2016 22:11:01 +0000 |
> First of all: is the "sandboxing" aspect of these environment important?
Taylan,
Thanks, that's exactly what I meant by "motivation" in my first reply.
(There was a recent, 6 months ago or so, thread on sandboxing in
guile-user by the way.)
Was Matt trying to prevent _access_ (inaccessible vs. read-only vs.
read/write) to data? Or was he trying to prevent only _visibility_
(e.g. for hygeine)?
I think we need to know more about "what" and "why" to answer his
question, rather than just "how"--if that makes any sense. Does
Racket [1] even _really_ achieve what he needs to do (_prevent_ access
for example)? We don't even know if we don't understand the
higher-level purpose.
(Basa)
[1] Disclaimer: I like Racket too--it is a great project. I just hate
to see someone leave Guile because of a minor technicality.
- Re: Transient environment with standard functions, Basa Centro, 2016/06/10
- Re: Transient environment with standard functions, Matthew Keeter, 2016/06/10
- Re: Transient environment with standard functions, Basa Centro, 2016/06/10
- Re: Transient environment with standard functions, Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer, 2016/06/10
- Re: Transient environment with standard functions,
Basa Centro <=
- Re: Transient environment with standard functions, Matthew Keeter, 2016/06/10
- Re: Transient environment with standard functions, Mike Gran, 2016/06/10
- Re: Transient environment with standard functions, Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer, 2016/06/10
- Re: Transient environment with standard functions, Basa Centro, 2016/06/11
- Re: Transient environment with standard functions, Matthew Keeter, 2016/06/11
Re: Transient environment with standard functions, Chris Vine, 2016/06/10