[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: How to make GNU Guile more successful
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: How to make GNU Guile more successful |
Date: |
Fri, 03 Mar 2017 10:18:12 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Nala Ginrut <address@hidden> writes:
> I think we have to elaborate the question clearer.
>
> 1. How to make guile-scheme more successful?
> I think this is similar to ask "how to make scheme more successful".
> This is the big question to the whole scheme community.
>
> 2. How to make guile platform more successful?
> I this case, let me ask a question, if we have guile-python3
> (compatible with most of Python3 features), and provide more
> convenient FFI helper function to help bind more libraries in short
> time, is it possible to attract more people from Python land? Given
> we'll have good JIT compiler in the future.
Frankly, I doubt that migration of large Python-based applications is
going to be a thing when nobody can even be bothered with immersing
himself in the problems with migrating LilyPond from Guile-1.8 to
Guile-2.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: How to make GNU Guile more successful, Amirouche, 2017/03/01
- Re: How to make GNU Guile more successful, Amirouche, 2017/03/01
- Re: How to make GNU Guile more successful, Arne Babenhauserheide, 2017/03/04
- Re: How to make GNU Guile more successful, Thomas Morley, 2017/03/04
- Re: How to make GNU Guile more successful, Thomas Morley, 2017/03/05
- Re: How to make GNU Guile more successful, David Kastrup, 2017/03/05
- Re: How to make GNU Guile more successful, Thomas Morley, 2017/03/05
- Re: How to make GNU Guile more successful, Thomas Morley, 2017/03/05
- Lilypond speed (was Re: How to make GNU Guile more successful), Andy Wingo, 2017/03/06