[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A value for "nothing"
From: |
Edwin Watkeys |
Subject: |
Re: A value for "nothing" |
Date: |
Sat, 15 Sep 2018 17:50:48 -0400 |
In previous work on validated systems in pharma manufacturing monitoring
settings, there’s the concept of not available (“NAV”) for measurements which
is used in contrast to not applicable (“NA”). We never used null/nil but always
one of the above when describing measurements.
Edwin Watkeys; 917-324-2435.
> On Sep 15, 2018, at 14:28, Keith Wright <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> HiPhish <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Not a fan of either, "nada" is not English, and "nix" is a slang term,
>> unlikely to be known to foreign speakers (I didn't know about it myself).
>> How
>> about "nihil", it's an inter-lingual term and close to "nil" in sound.
>
> none?
>
>
- Re: A value for "nothing", HiPhish, 2018/09/13
- Message not available
- Re: A value for "nothing", HiPhish, 2018/09/14
- Re: A value for "nothing", John Cowan, 2018/09/14
- Re: A value for "nothing", HiPhish, 2018/09/15
- Re: A value for "nothing", Keith Wright, 2018/09/15
- Re: A value for "nothing",
Edwin Watkeys <=
- Re: A value for "nothing", HiPhish, 2018/09/15
- Re: A value for "nothing", Edwin Watkeys, 2018/09/15
- Re: A value for "nothing", HiPhish, 2018/09/15
- Re: A value for "nothing", David Pirotte, 2018/09/15