[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A value for "nothing"
From: |
HiPhish |
Subject: |
Re: A value for "nothing" |
Date: |
Sun, 16 Sep 2018 00:13:43 +0200 |
That raises to connotation that there can be multiple of something: none, one,
many. Maybe "nothing" really is the best option. After all, "nihil" is just
Latin for "nothing", so I might as well use English.
> none?
- Re: A value for "nothing", HiPhish, 2018/09/13
- Message not available
- Re: A value for "nothing", HiPhish, 2018/09/14
- Re: A value for "nothing", John Cowan, 2018/09/14
- Re: A value for "nothing", HiPhish, 2018/09/15
- Re: A value for "nothing", Keith Wright, 2018/09/15
- Re: A value for "nothing", Edwin Watkeys, 2018/09/15
- Re: A value for "nothing", HiPhish, 2018/09/15
- Re: A value for "nothing", Edwin Watkeys, 2018/09/15
- Re: A value for "nothing",
HiPhish <=
- Re: A value for "nothing", David Pirotte, 2018/09/15