guile-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: mailmam, web bridge, forum, p2p (was: Diversification)


From: Mikael Djurfeldt
Subject: Re: mailmam, web bridge, forum, p2p (was: Diversification)
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 13:30:14 +0200

It would be nice to be able to run scheme code in the client:

https://github.com/google/schism

They mention "the Webassembly GC proposal". :)

Maybe some day, the Guile compiler could emit WASM? That would mean
supporting multiple VMs.

Mikael

Den tors 24 okt. 2019 18:16Nala Ginrut <address@hidden> skrev:

> I've ever tried to write a site for our local community without any JS
> code, all auxiliary features include simple animation are implemented with
> CSS.
> However, I have to say it's painful to write a more complex site. I don't
> know if there's any framework for that. I'm too lazy to write all things
> manually. But I recommend you try it if you never did. It's interesting.
>
> Best regards.
>
>
> <address@hidden> 于 2019年10月24日周四 22:58写道:
>
> > On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 11:35:52AM +0200, Amirouche Boubekki wrote:
> > > Le jeu. 24 oct. 2019 à 03:01, Nala Ginrut <address@hidden> a
> > écrit :
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > Last time I checked the security requirements for web application that
> > > do not rely on JavaScript was too complicated. I preferred to forget
> > > about it.
> > >
> > > See
> >
> https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/Cross-Site_Request_Forgery_Prevention_Cheat_Sheet.html
> >
> > Now this is interesting. I still dream of an "application"
> > which is viable (perhaps with some restrictions) without
> > any javascript (as Wikipedia and relatives do, BTW). So
> > I'm interested in such things as above...
> >
> > Cheers
> > -- tomás
> >
>


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]