[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Nyacc question: where are the actions bound?
From: |
tomas |
Subject: |
Re: Nyacc question: where are the actions bound? |
Date: |
Mon, 9 Mar 2020 10:07:12 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Sun, Mar 08, 2020 at 08:10:50AM -0700, Matt Wette wrote:
>
>
> On 3/8/20 3:14 AM, address@hidden wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I'm playing around with Nyacc [...]
> >So I defined some function =collect= which will be called from
> >actions in the grammar.
> >
> >My question is: where is the stuff resolved which is mentioned
> >in grammar actions? [...]
Thanks for your quick response, and for taking the time to make
sense of my diffuse text.
> Nyacc was envisioned with the paradigm you propose, by using tags.
> But I have not tried that in a while. If you look at the example calc
> in examples/nyacc/lang/calc/mach.scm you will see
Note that I'm not yet proposing a paradigm. What you (graciously)
raise to the level of "paradigm" is still just a set of prejudices
as I try to find a way through the bushes :)
I'm ready & willing to change my way of seeing things.
Care to explain why you havent tried your first paradigm in a
while? After all you're probably the one having the most practical
experience with Nyacc.
> (define (gen-calc-files)
[...]
> You can run this, then you can use the generated files to provide
> the parser [...]
> (define calc-full-act-v
[...]
Thanks for the hint. I'll definitely give that angle a try.
Cheers
-- tomás
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature