Re: Procedure arity and documentation

[Zelphir Kaltstahl]

Hi Taylan!

Hm. I see.

I am not quite sure I understand the implications of this. Am I still safe, if I
rely on procedure-minimum-arity, or is that just asking for my code to break at
a later point in time?

Regards,
Zelphir

On 5/27/21 12:23 PM, Taylan Kammer wrote:
> On 26.05.2021 21:33, Zelphir Kaltstahl wrote:
>> Is that a bug, or is it, because I am trying to use it in the REPL and there 
>> my
>> procedure is not compiled?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Zelphir
>>
> There's a relevant bug report I looked into recently:
>
> https://bugs.gnu.org/40294
>
> Quoting myself:
>
> It seems that commit 1c33be992e8120abd20add8021e4d91d226f5b6a removed
> much of the programs API at the C level but forgot to make the changes
> to the corresponding Scheme module.  (It was a big commit, part of
> changing the whole VM implementation.)
>
-- 
repositories: https://notabug.org/ZelphirKaltstahl