guile-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: New release of LSP server; LSP clients for Emacs and VSCodium availa


From: Aleix Conchillo Flaqué
Subject: Re: New release of LSP server; LSP clients for Emacs and VSCodium available
Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2022 16:42:45 -0700

Fantastic, thank you! I just packaged both scheme-json-rpc (as
guile-json-rpc) and scheme-lsp-server (as guile-lsp-server) for
homebrew-guile (https://github.com/aconchillo/homebrew-guile). Tests and
executable seem to work (or not fail) but I haven't really tried it yet.
The plan is to make it easy for everyone on macOS to hack on Guile using
either Emacs or VSCode.

Aleix


On Fri, Aug 5, 2022 at 1:08 PM Ricardo G. Herdt <r.herdt@posteo.de> wrote:

> Short update:
>
> there was a problem concerning automatic installation of server, and
> some other bugs. In case you tried to install the server or the clients
> and it didn't work properly, please try out the new versions available.
>
> Ricardo
>
> Am 04.08.2022 00:32 schrieb Ricardo G. Herdt:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I want to announce some releases related to LSP support for Scheme,
> > focusing on Guile.
> >
> > * scheme-lsp-server 0.1.3
> >
> > Besides bug fixes, here what's new:
> >
> > - scheme-lsp-server now selectively uses geiser code when doable. This
> > is especially the case for Guile. The goal is to encourage myself and
> > contributors to help improving Geiser, and directly benefit of its
> > development. Obviously only Scheme code is reused.
> >
> > - previously scheme-lsp-server assumed an LSP client would fire up a
> > REPL and let the user interact with it, showing LSP-related infos
> > depending on things the user actively loaded. This is not the way most
> > LSP-based tools expect an LSP-server to work though, and has some
> > downsides:
> >
> >    + implementing a client is not as trivial as it should be, since
> > the developer has to figure out a way to integrate a REPL into the
> > IDE/editor, and send commands to it to "guide" the LSP server.
> >    + developers used to other LSP-based tools can be surprised to see
> > that they have to actively load stuff in order to get meaningful
> > feedback from the IDE.
> >
> > Therefore I did a major design change: scheme-lsp-server now does it's
> > best to automatically compile/import files opened by the user
> > (including dependencies). This makes the task of implementing an LSP
> > client much easier: just launch guile-lsp-server and call it a day. I
> > added some notes regarding creating new LSP clients for other
> > editors/IDE's:
> >
> > https://codeberg.org/rgherdt/scheme-lsp-server#creating-an-lsp-client
> >
> > One important note: for now, the LSP server needs to "see" library
> > definitions in order to compile and import needed libraries. See
> >
> https://codeberg.org/rgherdt/scheme-lsp-server/#user-content-known-issues.
> >
> > * emacs-lsp-scheme 0.1.0 (available on MELPA)
> >
> > The first versions of emacs-lsp-scheme had a custom REPL (based on
> > Emacs' built-in scheme support) that was connected to the LSP server.
> > Following the changes to the LSP server, I decoupled the
> > emacs-lsp-scheme from the REPL. This seems to be a regression at
> > first, but the idea is that one can simply use "run-scheme" to launch
> > a REPL, and this does not interfere with the LSP server. For deeper
> > integration of Guile and Emacs, Geiser is still the way to go.
> > See the README file for instructions on how to configure it:
> > https://codeberg.org/rgherdt/emacs-lsp-scheme
> >
> > * vscode-scheme-lsp 0.2.1 (available for VSCodium on open-vsx)
> >
> > Following the same ideas of emacs-lsp-scheme, this extension now
> > focuses on basically providing LSP support. The user can install other
> > extensions to get syntax highlighting and an integrated REPL.
> > Here the code: https://codeberg.org/rgherdt/vscode-scheme-lsp.
> >
> > I only tested all this on Debian buster. Please let me know if you
> > experience any trouble installing/using it.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Ricardo G. Herdt
>
>


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]