[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
02/05: gnu: sbcl-cl-hooks: Fix typo.
|
From: |
guix-commits |
|
Subject: |
02/05: gnu: sbcl-cl-hooks: Fix typo. |
|
Date: |
Mon, 23 Sep 2019 16:02:12 -0400 (EDT) |
vagrantc pushed a commit to branch master
in repository guix.
commit 0def6a488cb70840f3bba6bd319be2af6f910582
Author: Vagrant Cascadian <address@hidden>
Date: Mon Sep 23 12:46:15 2019 -0700
gnu: sbcl-cl-hooks: Fix typo.
* gnu/packages/lisp (sbcl-cl-hooks)[description]: Fix spelling of
"possibilities".
---
gnu/packages/lisp.scm | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/lisp.scm b/gnu/packages/lisp.scm
index ee2d28e..985ed45 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/lisp.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/lisp.scm
@@ -6833,7 +6833,7 @@ Emacs.
In the Common LISP Object System (CLOS), a similar kind of extensibility is
possible using the flexible multi-method dispatch mechanism. It may even seem
-that the concept of hooks does not provide any benefits over the possibilites
+that the concept of hooks does not provide any benefits over the possibilities
of CLOS. However, there are some differences:
@itemize