Re: [Help-gsl] gsl and C++

[Brian Gough]

Paul Schneider writes:
 > Not that GSL has performance problems, but writing a C++ templated
 > static version of the GSL probably would be a lot faster than the
 > dynamic. E.g. routines that require pointers to functions could be run
 > with function templates, which in turn could be inlined.

A problem that was raised on the gsl-discuss list was that there was
no easy way to pass a function pointer to a member function from C++
to C.  The archives are at http://sources.redhat.com/gsl/ if
you want to look at it.

-- 
Brian Gough

Network Theory Ltd,
Publishing Free Software Manuals --- http://www.network-theory.co.uk/