[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Guix Docker image inflation
From: |
Leo Famulari |
Subject: |
Re: Guix Docker image inflation |
Date: |
Fri, 29 May 2020 14:37:31 -0400 |
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 08:21:08PM +0200, Marius Bakke wrote:
> Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> writes:
> > --branch and --commit would be passed to `guix pull`, and then you'd run
> > `guix system docker-image` based on that.
>
> There is also 'guix time-machine --commit=abc123 -- system docker-image'.
Right, that's probably more efficient than creating lots of `guix pull`
generations.
- Guix Docker image inflation, Stephen Scheck, 2020/05/27
- Re: Guix Docker image inflation, Leo Famulari, 2020/05/28
- Re: Guix Docker image inflation, Stephen Scheck, 2020/05/29
- Re: Guix Docker image inflation, Leo Famulari, 2020/05/29
- Re: Guix Docker image inflation, Stephen Scheck, 2020/05/29
- Re: Guix Docker image inflation, Leo Famulari, 2020/05/29
- Re: Guix Docker image inflation, Stephen Scheck, 2020/05/29
- Re: Guix Docker image inflation, Marius Bakke, 2020/05/29
- Re: Guix Docker image inflation,
Leo Famulari <=
- Re: Guix Docker image inflation, zimoun, 2020/05/29
- Re: Guix Docker image inflation, Stephen Scheck, 2020/05/29
- Re: Guix Docker image inflation, zimoun, 2020/05/29
- Re: Guix Docker image inflation, Stephen Scheck, 2020/05/29
Re: Guix Docker image inflation, zimoun, 2020/05/29