help-guix
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: problem with common lisp


From: Guillaume Le Vaillant
Subject: Re: problem with common lisp
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 10:27:26 +0200
User-agent: mu4e 1.4.13; emacs 27.1

Adam Kandur via <help-guix@gnu.org> skribis:

> hi everyone! 
> recently i started getting this error when i try to build any sbcl package:
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> starting phase `build'
> Invoking sbcl: 
> "/gnu/store/48v5srksa9nkp4hh527l6rb08pigy1bw-sbcl-2.0.9/bin/sbcl" 
> "--non-interactive" "--eval" "(require :asdf)" "--eval" "(asdf:load-asd 
> (truename 
> \"/gnu/store/fgfag09f1amsk82bs6jmg9h4rv6hqb94-sbcl-deploy-0.0.0-1.59fd497/share/common-lisp/sbcl-source/deploy/deploy.asd\")
>  :name \"deploy\")" "--eval" "(asdf:operate (quote asdf:compile-bundle-op) 
> \"deploy\")" 
> This is SBCL 2.0.9, an implementation of ANSI Common Lisp.
> More information about SBCL is available at <http://www.sbcl.org/>.
>
> SBCL is free software, provided as is, with absolutely no warranty.
> It is mostly in the public domain; some portions are provided under
> BSD-style licenses.  See the CREDITS and COPYING files in the
> distribution for more information.
> fatal error encountered in SBCL pid 15 tid 15:
> Unhandled SIGILL at 0x52000e9d.
>
> Error opening /dev/tty: No such device or address
> Welcome to LDB, a low-level debugger for the Lisp runtime environment.
> ldb> command 
> "/gnu/store/48v5srksa9nkp4hh527l6rb08pigy1bw-sbcl-2.0.9/bin/sbcl" 
> "--non-interactive" "--eval" "(require :asdf)" "--eval" "(asdf:load-asd 
> (truename 
> \"/gnu/store/fgfag09f1amsk82bs6jmg9h4rv6hqb94-sbcl-deploy-0.0.0-1.59fd497/share/common-lisp/sbcl-source/deploy/deploy.asd\")
>  :name \"deploy\")" "--eval" "(asdf:operate (quote asdf:compile-bundle-op) 
> \"deploy\")" failed with status 1
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> dont understand what went wrong, package definitions are unchanged

Hi,

The "Unhandled SIGILL at 0x52000e9d" error looks like the one in [1].
You could try downgrading sbcl to 2.0.8 to see if the error disappears.

[1] 
https://www.reddit.com/r/sbcl/comments/j824cs/does_binary_209_require_some_fancy_x86/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]