Re: trivial-build-system: ld can't find existing store files

[Christina O'Donnell]

Hi Simon,

Okay I can believe this, I'm only just learning about the autoconf and 
co. I've already submitted a patch, but I'm happy to change it to 
gnu-build-system if it'll make it simpler. autoconf is more automatic 
than I've given it credit for!

https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=68502

I've put it on my list of things to get back to when I next have a clean 
checkout.

Kind regard,
Christina O'Donnell

On 17/01/2024 16:40, Simon Tournier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 14 Jan 2024 at 11:10, Christina O'Donnell <cdo@mutix.org> wrote:
>
> > So I'm trying to write a package with a single C file using
> > trivial-build-system[1].
> Despite its name, trivial-build-system is the less trivial
> build-system.  Hum, gnu-build-system appears to me better for one single
> C file, even if there is no Makefile.
>
> Felix provided how to use trivial-build-system.  Well – aside I am not
> convinced that %build-inputs is a good way – as we see, many thing need
> to be configured by hand, when gnu-build-system does it for you.
>
> Cheers,
> simon