[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Guix Days: Patch flow discussion
From: |
Christopher Baines |
Subject: |
Re: Guix Days: Patch flow discussion |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Feb 2024 12:06:58 +0000 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.10.7; emacs 29.1 |
Clément Lassieur <clement@lassieur.org> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 16 2024, Andreas Enge wrote:
>
>> Am Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 11:56:50AM +0100 schrieb Clément Lassieur:
>>> Would it makes sense to have a "does-not-apply" tag too?
>>
>> Should this not appear in the QA page, assuming that once all the new
>> issues are closed, older ones will bubble to the top and be treated by QA?
>> (I am not sure if just looking at the n latests issues is how QA works,
>> but I think so.)
>
> I think it would be useful (at least for me) if I browse a list of
> patches that I want to review, to document why a review can't be done.
>
> Also, so that other people won't try to apply it.
>
> It would be great that QA does that job, I imagine when it does it it
> can also add that tag.
There's the filter issues form which allows finding patches which can't
be applied:
https://qa.guix.gnu.org/patches?failed-to-apply-patches=on
I think QA tagging issues might be useful for people to benefit from
that data in other places, and should be possible, it just needs QA to
send emails I think.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: Guix Days: Patch flow discussion, (continued)
Re: Guix Days: Patch flow discussion, Suhail, 2024/02/05
Re: Guix Days: Patch flow discussion, Felix Lechner, 2024/02/05
Re: Guix Days: Patch flow discussion, Suhail, 2024/02/06
Re: Guix Days: Patch flow discussion, Suhail, 2024/02/06
Re: Guix Days: Patch flow discussion, Clément Lassieur, 2024/02/16
Re: Guix Days: Patch flow discussion, Suhail, 2024/02/17