[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ShadowFS (status)
|
From: |
Moritz Schulte |
|
Subject: |
Re: ShadowFS (status) |
|
Date: |
03 Aug 2001 15:32:14 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 |
nisse@lysator.liu.se (Niels Möller) writes:
> > Also an interesting case: One underlying fs provides a file x, and
> > one a directory x. What do you do?
>
> read/write requests go to the file, dir-lookups to the directory? At
> least that's a reasonable way to define the "union" of the
> nodes. I'm not sure that it is a reasonable for users, though...
I think such magic is a bit confusing for the user..
moritz
--
Moritz Schulte <moritz@chaosdorf.de> http://www.chaosdorf.de/moritz/
Debian/GNU supporter - http://www.debian.org/ http://www.gnu.org/
GPG fingerprint = 3A14 3923 15BE FD57 FC06 B501 0841 2D7B 6F98 4199
- ShadowFS (status), Moritz Schulte, 2001/08/02
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/08/02
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Moritz Schulte, 2001/08/02
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/08/02
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Moritz Schulte, 2001/08/02
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Niels Möller, 2001/08/03
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/08/03
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/08/03
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Niels Möller, 2001/08/03
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/08/03
- Re: ShadowFS (status),
Moritz Schulte <=
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Moritz Schulte, 2001/08/03
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/08/03
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Neal H Walfield, 2001/08/03
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/08/03
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Neal H Walfield, 2001/08/03
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/08/26
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Marcus Brinkmann, 2001/08/26
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Moritz Schulte, 2001/08/26
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/08/26
- Re: ShadowFS (status), Moritz Schulte, 2001/08/26