[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: /proc and other Linuxisms
|
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
|
Subject: |
Re: /proc and other Linuxisms |
|
Date: |
Thu, 14 Feb 2002 10:27:51 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 12:31:38PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Ludovic Courtès <ludovic.courtes@utbm.fr> writes:
>
> > $ ldd `which uname`
> > libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x40020000)
> > /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x40000000)
> >
> > The Hurd glibc should have the same symbols as the Linux' glibc,
> > right?
>
> Wrong.
Any more details to say? Or any pointer to relevant documentation?
Thanks,
Ludovic.
- /proc and other Linuxisms, Ludovic Courtès, 2002/02/12
- Re: /proc and other Linuxisms, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/02/12
- Re: /proc and other Linuxisms, Farid Hajji, 2002/02/12
- Re: /proc and other Linuxisms, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/02/12
- Re: /proc and other Linuxisms, Jeroen Dekkers, 2002/02/13
- Re: /proc and other Linuxisms, Ludovic Courtès, 2002/02/13
- Re: /proc and other Linuxisms, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/02/13
- Re: /proc and other Linuxisms,
Ludovic Courtès <=
- Re: /proc and other Linuxisms, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/02/14
Re: /proc and other Linuxisms, Farid Hajji, 2002/02/12