Re: Trying to.... It's amazing and it works!

[Thomas Bushnell, BSG]

Manu Valderrama <cp46tan@hotpop.com> writes:

> This means that a port name can contain both receive and send right;
> when a send once right
> is needed, every send one right must have its own port name ( send
> once right is different ).
> Is this the idea ? I hope yes!

Yes, this is correct.

Note that send-once rights are different: they are always unique
names (which provides for a few important optimizations).

> In this case it would be more easy to allocate the port in this way (
> I have made it, and
> it has worked ) :
> 
> mach_port_allocate( mach_task_self(),
> MACH_PORT_RIGHT_RECEIVE|MACH_PORT_RIGHT_SEND,                 &receive_port
> );