[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Debian-Gentoo collaboration on GNU/Hurd ports
From: |
Jon Portnoy |
Subject: |
Re: Debian-Gentoo collaboration on GNU/Hurd ports |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Mar 2003 09:03:33 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 01:33:31PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
[snip]
>
> fine for me. what if we use a tag to indicate clearly the message is a
> porting patch? eg, if we put "[ported]" or the like in subject it'll be
> made sure we don't forget to look at it and forward it to the respective bts
>
Sounds good to me.
[snip]
>
> because the situation is assymetrical at the moment, you have no choice but
> always looking in debian for already-made patches if you want them, but
> debian porters don't need to look in gentoo places for patches. if we follow
> the guideline of always sending new patches to help-hurd, then debian porters
> won't ever need to look in gentoo places, and gentoo porters will stop
> looking in debian places some day. is that ok for you?
>
Indeedy. :-)
[snip]
--
Jon Portnoy
avenj/irc.freenode.net
- Debian-Gentoo collaboration on GNU/Hurd ports, Robert Millan, 2003/03/26
- Re: Debian-Gentoo collaboration on GNU/Hurd ports, Jeff Bailey, 2003/03/27
- Re: Debian-Gentoo collaboration on GNU/Hurd ports, Robert Millan, 2003/03/27
- Re: Debian-Gentoo collaboration on GNU/Hurd ports, Marcus Brinkmann, 2003/03/27
- Re: Debian-Gentoo collaboration on GNU/Hurd ports, Jeff Bailey, 2003/03/27
- Re: Debian-Gentoo collaboration on GNU/Hurd ports, Marcus Brinkmann, 2003/03/28
- Re: Debian-Gentoo collaboration on GNU/Hurd ports, Jeff Bailey, 2003/03/28
- Re: Debian-Gentoo collaboration on GNU/Hurd ports, Jeff Bailey, 2003/03/27