[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Hurd and Unix/Linux and Plan9 features
|
From: |
Michael Banck |
|
Subject: |
Re: Hurd and Unix/Linux and Plan9 features |
|
Date: |
Sat, 3 Feb 2007 15:18:02 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403 |
On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 12:37:16AM +1300, Shams wrote:
> Regarding HurdNG:
> 2. Are all Debian GNU/Hurd efforts and existing developers efforts
> going to be towards HurdNG. More specifically is the current Hurd
> going to be abandoned in favour of HurdNG, what is the future of this
> current Hurd?
I guess this question will get evaluated once HurdNG is actually running
and installable.
> 3. Has the microkernel for HurdNG been chosen and if so then what
> language is going to be used for HurdNG and the microkernel?
See the l4-hurd list for more information on this. HurdNG is discussed
there.
Michael
- Hurd and Unix/Linux and Plan9 features, Shams, 2007/02/01
- Re: Hurd and Unix/Linux and Plan9 features, Ivan Shmakov, 2007/02/03
- Re: Hurd and Unix/Linux and Plan9 features, Shams, 2007/02/03
- Re: Hurd and Unix/Linux and Plan9 features, olafBuddenhagen, 2007/02/03
- Re: Hurd and Unix/Linux and Plan9 features, Ivan Shmakov, 2007/02/04
- Re: Hurd and Unix/Linux and Plan9 features, Shams, 2007/02/04
- Re: Hurd and Unix/Linux and Plan9 features, Pierre THIERRY, 2007/02/06
- Re: Hurd and Unix/Linux and Plan9 features, Ivan Shmakov, 2007/02/07
- Re: Hurd and Unix/Linux and Plan9 features, Pierre THIERRY, 2007/02/07
- symbolic links & `..' entry, Ivan Shmakov, 2007/02/08
- Re: symbolic links & `..' entry, Pierre THIERRY, 2007/02/08
- Re: symbolic links & `..' entry, Ivan Shmakov, 2007/02/10