[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
must "cvs update" before "cvs commit", why??
|
From: |
Louis-David Mitterrand |
|
Subject: |
must "cvs update" before "cvs commit", why?? |
|
Date: |
Fri, 13 Oct 2000 09:26:34 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.9i |
This is really strange: often some changed files won't be committed
unless I perform a general "cvs update" (where this changed files appear
as M). After the update the "cvs commit" works fine. And FWIW I am the
only committer on this repository.
Why the two-stage process?
TIA
--
Louis-David Mitterrand - address@hidden - http://www.apartia.org
<sgore> We Are Debian. You Will Be Packaged. Media Opinion Is Irrelevant.
- must "cvs update" before "cvs commit", why??,
Louis-David Mitterrand <=