[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Crazy idea - replace RCS backend with ClearCase...!!!
From: |
James Melton |
Subject: |
Re: Crazy idea - replace RCS backend with ClearCase...!!! |
Date: |
Wed, 23 May 2001 13:53:52 -0400 |
The only way your idea works is if the CVS server is carefully
architected to separate the storage mechanism from the rest of the code.
I don't know if it is, and apparently no one answering on this list does
either, which is itself a bad sign.
Are you looking for dual interface capabilities, i.e. People can
checkout/in, label, branch, etc. using ClearCase and CVS concurrently?
The closest thing to a reasonable sounding approach to doing this came
from Noel L Yap:
> It might be easier instead to create scripts that look like CVS,
> but calls CC underneath.
However, if you are also hoping to set up a remote CVS server this won't
work - you need all the network code from CVS.
If you don't need update access from both CVS and CC, I would create two
repositories where one is a read-only replica of the other. Automating
replication in one direction sounds much easier than what you describe.
Good Luck and keep us posted,
Jim Melton.
- Re: Crazy idea - replace RCS backend with ClearCase...!!!, (continued)
- RE: Crazy idea - replace RCS backend with ClearCase...!!!, Weber, Mathias-Henry 1254 PPW-P1, 2001/05/23
- Re: Crazy idea - replace RCS backend with ClearCase...!!!, Noel L Yap, 2001/05/23
- Re: Crazy idea - replace RCS backend with ClearCase...!!!, David D. Hagood, 2001/05/23
- Re: Crazy idea - replace RCS backend with ClearCase...!!!, Noel L Yap, 2001/05/23
- RE: Crazy idea - replace RCS backend with ClearCase...!!!, Harkins, Jim, 2001/05/23
- Re: Crazy idea - replace RCS backend with ClearCase...!!!,
James Melton <=
- RE: Crazy idea - replace RCS backend with ClearCase...!!!, Weber, Mathias-Henry 1254 PPW-P1, 2001/05/28