[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Use of CVS on large scales
From: |
Greg A. Woods |
Subject: |
Re: Use of CVS on large scales |
Date: |
Fri, 8 Jun 2001 12:59:34 -0400 (EDT) |
[ On Friday, June 8, 2001 at 09:30:01 (-0400), Donald Sharp wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: Use of CVS on large scales
>
> CVS starts to break down( ie become unuseable ) with
> over a 100 developers actively developing at a single time.
> This is related to how cvs does file locking inside of
> the repository when people commit/update/checkout in the
> repository.
*AND* if you have large modules. There shouldn't be any issue if you
have many small modules...
> Another good advantage of Clearcase is the multisite capabilities.
> If you have developers working at a large number of remote
> sites, you might want to think seriously about this. Especially
> if they are connected at a relatively slow ethernet speeds
> or their connection can be unreliable
that's where I'd recommend BitKeeper over CVS -- it's just getting ready
for prime time, but has infinitely better multi-site capabilities than
anything else I've ever heard of....
--
Greg A. Woods
+1 416 218-0098 VE3TCP <address@hidden> <address@hidden>
Planix, Inc. <address@hidden>; Secrets of the Weird <address@hidden>
- Re: Use of CVS on large scales, (continued)
- Re: Use of CVS on large scales, Mike Castle, 2001/06/07
- Re: Use of CVS on large scales, Jim Ray, 2001/06/08
- Re: Use of CVS on large scales, Donald Sharp, 2001/06/08
- Re: Use of CVS on large scales, Bob Bowen, 2001/06/11
- Re: Use of CVS on large scales, Greg A. Woods, 2001/06/12
Re: Use of CVS on large scales,
Greg A. Woods <=
Re: Use of CVS on large scales, Ralph Mack, 2001/06/08
RE: Use of CVS on large scales, Kostur, Andre, 2001/06/08
RE: Use of CVS on large scales, Pyatt, Scott, 2001/06/08
Re: Use of CVS on large scales, Ralph Mack, 2001/06/08
RE: Use of CVS on large scales, Teala Spitzbarth, 2001/06/09
RE: Use of CVS on large scales, Thornley, David, 2001/06/12