[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Future CVS Development
From: |
Kostur, Andre |
Subject: |
RE: Future CVS Development |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Jun 2001 09:56:47 -0700 |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Noel L Yap [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 8:49 AM
> To: address@hidden
> Cc: address@hidden
> Subject: RE: Future CVS Development
>
>
> CVS only requires files to be mergable. This has a different
> meaning from
> requiring files to be non-binary.
>
> One thing that may be done is to add a hook for pluggable
> diffing/merging
> engines.
Now, pluggable engines would be truly cool! I know that one large argument
against CVS here (my office) was that it doesn't do "intelligent" things
with proprietary format non-mergable files (like MSWord documents), where
other source control systems can do (the counterexample was always
Clearcase). But if you could plug in a diff/patch tool for *.doc files,
(and perhaps a different diff/patch tool for *.ppt, another for *.xls) that
would make these files mergable, and thus behave sensibly in CVS! :)
- Re: Future CVS Development, (continued)
- RE: Future CVS Development, Noel L Yap, 2001/06/19
- RE: Future CVS Development, Noel L Yap, 2001/06/19
- RE: Future CVS Development, Noel L Yap, 2001/06/19
- RE: Future CVS Development, Noel L Yap, 2001/06/19
- Re: Future CVS Development, Noel L Yap, 2001/06/19
- RE: Future CVS Development,
Kostur, Andre <=
- RE: Future CVS Development, Thornley, David, 2001/06/19
- RE: Future CVS Development, Thornley, David, 2001/06/19
- RE: Future CVS Development, Noel L Yap, 2001/06/19
- RE: Future CVS Development, Noel L Yap, 2001/06/19
- RE: Future CVS Development, Kostur, Andre, 2001/06/19
- RE: Future CVS Development, Noel L Yap, 2001/06/19
- RE: Future CVS Development, Noel L Yap, 2001/06/19