Re: checking links into source control

[Kaz Kylheku]

In article <address@hidden>, Edward Peschko wrote:
>> > way.
>> > 
>> > So far no one has disagreed. So is everyone in agreement with this basic 
>> > goal? 
>> 
>> All of that can be managed by the build system.  You don't need it in
>> cvs.

[...]

>I shouldn't be told what needs to be part of the build process because of 
>limitations in a tool.

Not combining unrelated responsibilities into the same program is not
necessarily a limitation.  What would you say about an e-mail application
that contains a C compiler, and a filesystem repair tool?