Re: checking links into source control

[David Taylor]

Kaz Kylheku wrote:

> In article <address@hidden>, Edward Peschko wrote:
> >> > way.
> >> >
> >> > So far no one has disagreed. So is everyone in agreement with this basic 
> >> > goal?
> >>
> >> All of that can be managed by the build system.  You don't need it in
> >> cvs.
>
> [...]
>
> >I shouldn't be told what needs to be part of the build process because of
> >limitations in a tool.
>
> Not combining unrelated responsibilities into the same program is not
> necessarily a limitation.  What would you say about an e-mail application
> that contains a C compiler, and a filesystem repair tool?

I'd say "emacs" . ;-)

dtayl